SC Rejects Kanimozhi’s Bail Plea For third time

kanimozhiA special bench division of the Supreme Court on Monday rejected the bail plea of the DMK MP Kanimozhi and Kalaignar TV MD Sajjan Kumar in the 2G spectrum scam case. Though the Supreme Court provided that she can move to the trial court afresh for filing charges for the bail again and the rejection of her bail plea by the Supreme Court will not affect the decision of the trial court. The Apex court also provided that section 437 of the Criminal Procedure Court provides for grant of bail for women in cognizable offenses.It was alleged that Kanimozhi and Sharad Kumar received a bribe of Rs 200 crore from Cineyug Films through Shahid Balwa’s DB Realty.

Continue reading

Kanimozhi opposes CBI plea in 2G Scam case

KanimozhiThe CBI‘s fresh plea of invoking an additional charge of criminal breach of trust on DMK MP Kanimozhi and Kalaignar TV MD Sharad Pawar was opposed by both of them and a dismissal of the plea was sought on the ground that they were neither part of conspiracy relating to allocation of spectrum and were nor the alleged beneficiaries of 2G spectrum licenses. The reply was filed in conformity with its October 7 deadline.

Continue reading

SC rejects Kanimozhi’s bail plea

Kanimozhi-bail-rejectedA special Supreme Court bench on Monday rejected bail pleas of DMK MP Kanimozhi and Kalaignar TV MD Sharad Kumar in the 2G spectrum scam case. Apex Court in its order gave liberty to Kanimozhi to move to trial court afresh for bail after framing of charges in the case. Court in its order said that she could invoke section 437 of criminal procedure code which provides for grant of bail to women in cognizable offences. The case was heard by a bench headed by Justice GS Singvi, who has been monitoring the case since the beginning and had asked searching questions to the government on the role of several influential people in the multi-crore scam. Kanimozhi and Kumar have been accused by the CBI to be involved in the illegal transaction of Rs 200 crore to Kalaignar TV which was alleged to be a bribe given by a telecom operator which had benefited in the scam. The CBI filed had filed an affidavit opposing their bail pleas on the ground that if released, they could tamper with evidence and influence witnesses. Opposing the bail plea, the probe agency contended in its affidavit that Kanimozhi and Kumar were key conspirators and Rs 200 crore transferred to Kalaignar TV was part of the “bribe” amount and not a loan as claimed by the accused. Earlier two judges P Sathasivam and AK Patnaik before whom the matter was listed had recused themselves from the high-profile case.

Continue reading