Whereas corporate affairs minister M Veerappa Moily refused that he was sad after being removed from the chair of law ministry, the blame ends an unanticipated suffered by the government is not likely to be put into the order soon as the leader to feel indignantly aggrieved is being held to the report relating to the reverses.

Veerappa Moily intensely resented being accused of not managing the government’s cases like the 2G, salwa judum and black money, and this initiate his violent display against vested interests. Keen not be seen as discontented, he said that he was willing to work in any portfolio allotted to him.

Taking into account of the SC’s monitoring role and the feedback of concerned ministries, the law ministry had a confined role in cases being check and control by the Supreme Court and with investigative agencies unwilling to share status reports. The determination of selection to appoint K K Venugopal as counsel, make U U Lalit public prosecutor and ask noted lawyer Rohington Mistry to seem likely in a telecom case became critical.

This fault or guilty game is not likely to be put into the order soon although the government seems to have inclined on the side of the law ministry’s connoisseur in its response to the resignation of solicitor general Gopal Subramaniam, whom it ready to let go. It has not seen adequate virtue in his allegation of being in his ignorance unnoticed in the appointment of Mistry.

According to Telecom ministry well kept that Mistry has appointed for a case that was coming up for the admission, and was not a part of the 2G case. It was a Public Interest Litigation seeking the case be summed up to the investigation and Subramaniam had been preferably festinate in making it a standing of honour subject.

An unlikely result of settlement in Moily case

Report by Vibhanshu Vaibhav